THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID F. OTT and DANIEL J. PAPISH ____________ Appeal No. 97-0081 Application No. 08/226,5321 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before LYDDANE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 14, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We REVERSE. BACKGROUND Application for patent filed April 12, 1994.1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007