THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte LAWRENCE P. KLEMANN and JOHN W. FINLEY _____________ Appeal No. 93-2111 Application 07/630,4521 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before GRON, HANLON and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-23, all of the claims pending in the application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 1 Application for patent filed December 19, 1990. According to applicants, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/336,821, filed April 11, 1989, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007