THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte VINCENT SAUVINET, JEAN BLETRY, MICHELINE BONNAUD
and MAURICE TROUVE
__________
Appeal No. 93-2172
Application 07/363,7581
__________
HEARD: June 11, 1997
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WALTZ , Administrative Patent2
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 10, 1989. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 06/821,365 filed January 22, 1986, now U.S. Patent
No. 4,859,499 granted August 22, 1989.
2Administrative Patent Judge Waltz has been substituted
for Administrative Patent Judge Thierstein who participated in
the hearing but retired prior to the rendering of this decision.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007