Ex parte SAUVINET et al. - Page 2




                Appeal No. 93-2172                                                                                                            
                Application 07/363,758                                                                                                        


                         This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                                                         
                rejection of claims 37  and 43-66.   3                                                                                        
                         Claims 37, 43, 46, 47 and 59 are representative and are                                                              
                reproduced below:                                                                                                             
                         37. A plate of glass coated with a layer containing indium                                                           
                and tin oxides having zones of a low emissivity and resistivity                                                               
                of less than or equal to 0.15 and 3 x 10  ohm-cm, respectively     -4                                                         
                for a thickness of between about 1800 and 4500 angstroms with at                                                              
                least one other zone wherein the emissivity and resistivity are                                                               
                higher than 0.15 and 3 x 10  ohm-cm, respectively that is-4                                                                               
                produced by:                                                                                                                  
                         preparing a dry metal composition containing indium formate;                                                         
                         mixing at least a powdered or gaseous tin compound or a                                                              
                gaseous organotin compound with the indium formate in proportions                                                             
                ranging from one to thirty weight percent;                                                                                    
                         depositing said composition onto a surface of a heated                                                               
                substrate with coating means so as to pyrolyze the composition;                                                               
                and                                                                                                                           
                         heating the coated substrate to enhance the properties of                                                            
                the layer.                                                                                                                    

                         43. A plate of glass coated with a pyrolyzed metal oxide                                                             
                layer comprising indium oxide formed by depositing a                                                                          
                predetermined amount of an organic indium compound on a heated                                                                
                substrate, thereby pyrolyzing the indium compound.                                                                            



                         3The examiner’s final rejection inadvertently failed to                                                              
                treat claim 37, which claim was specifically rejected in the                                                                  
                Answer and denoted as a new rejection.  Appellants’ Reply Brief                                                               
                and concurrently filed amendment were denied entry by the                                                                     
                examiner.                                                                                                                     
                                                                      2                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007