THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ARBOR D. DRINKWINE and BRIAN R. CAGE
__________
Appeal No. 94-1098
Application 07/712,5811
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before COHEN, JOHN D. SMITH and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 3, 5-10 and 25-29, all the claims pending in the
application. We reverse.2
1Application for patent filed June 10, 1991.
2A proposed amendment filed subsequent to the final
rejection has not been entered. See the advisory letter mailed
December 17, 1992 (Paper No. 9).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007