Ex parte DRINKWINE et al. - Page 3




                Appeal No. 94-1098                                                                                                            
                Application 07/712,581                                                                                                        


                of vapor in the stream.                                                                                                       
                         The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                                                              
                support of rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                                                                              
                Gelman                                    2,880,071                                 Mar. 31, 1959                             
                Stenger et al. (Stenger) 3,459,938                                                  Aug.  5, 1969                             
                Jones et al. (Jones)                      3,877,875                                 Apr. 15, 1975                             
                Munk                                      4,942,018                                 Jul. 17, 1990                             

                         The following rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are before us                                                         
                for review:                                                                                                                   
                         a) claims 1, 6, 8-10, 25 and 29, unpatentable over Stenger;3                                                         
                         b) claims 3, 26 and 27, unpatentable over Stenger in view of                                                         
                Munk;                                                                                                                         
                         c) claims 5 and 28, unpatentable over Stenger in view of                                                             
                Jones; and                                                                                                                    
                         d) claim 7, unpatentable over Stenger in view of Gelman.                                                             
                         Stenger, the principal reference, is directed to a method                                                            
                and apparatus for determining the inorganic carbon content of a                                                               
                liquid.  Stenger’s method involves generating a stream of carrier                                                             
                gas free of carbon dioxide by means of a carrier gas supply means                                                             
                2, and injecting into the stream at inlet 64 (see Figure 2) a                                                                 
                sample of a liquid whose inorganic carbon content is to be                                                                    


                         3A rejection of these claims as being anticipated by Stenger                                                         
                has been withdrawn.  See page 7 of the answer.                                                                                
                                                                      3                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007