THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT CATANEO
and RALPH CATANEO
__________
Appeal No. 94-1549
Application 07/945,5401
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GRON, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1
through 15. Claims 17 through 21 are pending but have been withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner.
1Application for patent filed September 16, 1992. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/528,348, filed May 22, 1990;
which is a continuation of Application 07/226,953, filed August 1, 1988; and a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/379,182, filed July 13, 1989, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/226,953, filed August 1, 1988.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007