Appeal No. 94-1549 Application 07/945,540 of appellants that “claim 2 was to recite a remover ‘consisting essentially of’ ester, ether, and water.” While that may be appellants’ intention, we must take the claims as they appear before us on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, fourth paragraph. The decision of the examiner is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT William F. Smith ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) Teddy S. Gron ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007