THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TERRY F. PLASSE
__________
Appeal No. 94-2477
Application 07/893,5541
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and WILLIAM F. SMITH and
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4
through 6, 8 through 10, and 12, all the claims remaining in the application.
1 Application for patent filed June 3, 1992. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/661,514, filed February 26, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007