THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte AHMAD MORADI-ARAGHI
_____________
Appeal No. 94-3134
Application 07/848,8841
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before METZ and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges and
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1 through 28 which are all of the claims in the
application.
Application for patent filed March 10, 1992. According to applicant, the1
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/580,066, filed September 10,
1990, now Patent No. 5,179,136, granted January 12, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007