THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YOSHIBUMI MATSUDA, MASAAKI FUTAMOTO,
YOSHINORI MIYAMURA, TOKUHO TAKAGAKI,
HISASHI TAKANO, FUMIO KUGIYA, TAKESHI
NAKAO, KYO AKAGI, MIKIO SUZUKI,
HIROTSUGU FUKUOKA and TAKAYUKI MUNEMOTO
_____________
Appeal No. 94-3857
Application 07/740,7081
______________
HEARD: July 17, 1997
_______________
Before GARRIS, GRON and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 3 through 12, 21 and 27 through 29. The only other2
claims remaining in the application, which are claims 13 through
1 Application for patent filed August 6, 1991.
2 We observe the following informality which is deserving of correction.
On the last line of claim 27, “magnetic substrate” plainly should read --
nonmagnetic substrate--.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007