Appeal No. 94-4239 Application 07/942,293 1 through 4, 6, and 7. Claim 5, the only other claim in the application, stands withdrawn from consideration by the examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b). Appellants' invention pertains to an extended field- of-view mirror. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears below. 1. An extended field-of-view mirror, the mirror comprising: (a) a convex reflective surface having a viewing area and a continuous perimetral edge surrounding the viewing area: (b) an opaque band integrally formed with the reflective surface and depending therefrom, the opaque band substantially surrounding the entire reflective surface; and (c) a mounting flange integrally formed with the opaque band and extending outwardly therefrom. As evidence of anticipation, the examiner has relied upon the reference specified below: Horton 1,811,823 June 23, 1931 An additional reference of record relied upon by this panel of the board in a new ground of rejection, infra, is: 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007