THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MARK E. KNUTH and OM P. SAHAI
__________
Appeal No. 94-4497
Application 07/913,7821
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 14, 1992. According to appellants,
this application is a continuation of Application 07/635,461 filed February 1,
1991, now abandoned, which is a division of Application 07/221,951 filed July
22, 1988, now U.S. Patent No. 5,068,184 issued November 26, 1991, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/078,745 filed July 28, 1987, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007