Appeal No. 94-4497 Application 07/913,782 For the foregoing reasons, the examiner has not met his burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness over the cited prior art. In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1471-1473, 223 USPQ 785, 787-788 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge) ) ) ) CAMERON WEIFFENBACH ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) JOAN ELLIS ) Administrative Patent Judge) Jacques M. Dulin Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro 10 Almaden Blvd., Suite 800 San Jose, CA 95113 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4Last modified: November 3, 2007