THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MILTON D. GOLDENBERG
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0206
Application 07/866,7891
______________
HEARD: August 5, 1997
_______________
Before MEISTER, JERRY SMITH and THIERSTEIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 7, 1992, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/167,077, filed March 11,
1988, now U.S. Patent No. 5,101,827, issued April 7, 1992, which
is a continuation of Application 06/751,877, filed July 5, 1985,
now U.S. Patent No. 4,735,210 issued April 5, 1988.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007