Ex parte LE GROW et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                                    Paper No. 11                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                   Ex parte GARY E. LE GROW                                                                   
                                                    and JOHN C. SMITH JR.                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 95-0222                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/145,5531                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before PAK, WARREN and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                             

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    

                         This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                               
                rejection of claims 15 through 34, which are all of the claims                                                                
                remaining in the application.                                                                                                 

                         1Application for patent filed November 4, 1993.  According                                                           
                to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application                                                              
                08/013,877 filed February 5, 1993.                                                                                            

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007