THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GARY E. LE GROW
and JOHN C. SMITH JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0222
Application 08/145,5531
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 15 through 34, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed November 4, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
08/013,877 filed February 5, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007