Appeal No. 95-0415
Application 08/013,877
evidence. We do wish to point out, however, that the evidence is
not commensurate in scope with claims 1 and 9-14 and thus, cannot
overcome the prima facie case of obviousness with respect
thereto. See In re Lindner, 457 F.2d 506, 508, 173 USPQ 356,
358 (CCPA 1972).
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner refusing to allow claims 1 and
9-14 is affirmed.
The decision of the examiner refusing to allow claims 2-8 is
reversed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007