THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION This opinion (1) was not written for publication and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LOUIS A. VANDERWILT ____________ Appeal No. 95-0421 Application 07/880,702 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before MARTIN, JERRY SMITH, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Applicant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. No other claims are pending. We reverse. FINDINGS OF FACT We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the arguments of Applicant and the examiner. Our decision presumes familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the evidence of record supports each of the following fact findings.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007