THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KAZUYA ONO, AKIRA YASUDA
and KATSUJI KITAGAWA
________________
Appeal No. 95-0442
Application 08/026,1831
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1 and 3-5, which are all of the claims remaining in the
1Application for patent filed March 1, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/655,023, filed February 14, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007