THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS C. KOWALSKI
and ROBERT W. PIKE
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0562
Application 07/878,9401
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 3, and 5 through 24. Copies of representative claims
1 and 23 are reproduced in an attached appendix.
The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:
Application for patent filed May 5, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007