Ex parte RUSS et al. - Page 6




              Appeal No. 95-0876                                                                                          
              Application 08/006,517                                                                                      



              rejection of these claims will not be sustained.  Additionally, we will enter a rejection of                
              claims under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                                                             
                     It is our finding that the Esmay disclosure is directed to a removable pressure-                     
              sensitive adhesive tape which has an alkyl acrylate polymer which is sufficiently low-tack                  
              so that it is readily peelable from applied substrates after prolonged dwell time.  The                     
              adhesive coating provides effective adhesion to a substrate of paper, metal, glass, plastic                 
              or painted surfaces.  Column 2, lines 23-25.  The double-coated tape may be readily and                     
              cleanly removed both from the object being mounted and from the substrate to which the                      
              object is mounted.  Column 2, lines 34-37.   Thus we concur in the examiner’s finding that                  
              the adhesive disclosed in Esmay is of the repositionable type.  While the tape in Esmay                     
              provides sufficient adhesive properties, it is noted that since the adhesives are cured by                  
              photopolymerization, the adhesive will not self adhere when the tape is rolled up in a spiral               
              fashion.  According to Esmay, this provides a distinctive advantage in that the double-                     
              coated tape of the invention can be wound directly upon itself for storage and shipment                     
              without any need for a disposable liner.  Column 2,    lines 42-44.  Inasmuch as Esmay                      
              purposely dispenses with the removable liner, as it is unnecessary given his adhesive                       
              composition, we are in agreement with the appellants that it would not have been obvious                    
              to apply a removable liner to the tape of Esmay when rolled for dispensing and shipment.                    
              While we are in agreement with the examiner that obviousness is not determined solely on                    

                                                            6                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007