Ex parte RUSS et al. - Page 10




              Appeal No. 95-0876                                                                                          
              Application 08/006,517                                                                                      



              column 1, lines 24-27.  Kellgren further discloses that when it is desirable to remove the                  
              sheet material, it is only necessary to pull it free.  Kellgren also discloses that either the              
              attached sheet or the double-sided tape will be pulled free and then if the double-sided                    
              tape still adheres to the substrate, it can be removed easily.  See     column 1, lines 29-33.              
              Thus, there can be little doubt that the Kellgren patent discloses a double-sided                           
              repositional tape.                                                                                          
                     With respect to the method of making, Figure 2 of Kellgren shows applying a first                    
              and second adhesive coat to elongated tape substrate on the first and second faces                          
              thereof by way of a bath of pressure sensitive adhesive and a volatile solvent in coating                   
              tank 6.  After the solvent is removed in a drying oven 20, a temporary liner is added to the                
              double-sided tape.  In Figure 3, a dilute bath of the pressure sensitive adhesive is added                  
              to the tape substrate in tank 15 before the tape is coated with its main adhesive.                          
              Therefore, the dilute pressure sensitive adhesive comprises a tie layer to join the principal               
              adhesive layers to the substrate as shown in Figure 3.  Finally with regard to Figure 4,                    
              Figure 4 shows a removable liner being applied to the tape and the tape being slit before                   
              the tape is wound into a spiral to be shipped to the user.  Claims 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 13, 17, 20,               
              21, 22, and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as clearly anticipated by Kellgren.                    
              As noted above, Kellgren discloses all the limitations of the method of making the tape, the                
              method of using the tape, and the tape, per se.                                                             

                                                           10                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007