THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STANLEY R. SHANFIELD, BHARAT PATEL and HERMANN STATZ
____________
Appeal No. 95-0926
Application 08/026,2221
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed February 23, 1993. According1
to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/825,795 filed January 21, 1992, now abandoned and a continuation
of Application 07/629,317 filed December 18, 1990, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007