THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NAOHISA KOMETANI, KOICHI
UENO and KOJI ECHIGO
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0938
Application 07/796,3101
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before BARRETT, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 6-11. No claim has been
allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Sakai et al. (Sakai) 5,067,374 Nov. 26, 1991
1Application for patent filed November 22, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007