Appeal No. 95-1220
Application 07/972,279
The references relied on by the Examiner are as
follows:
Crane 3,394,347 July 23, 1968
Peppers et al. (Peppers) 4,862,511 Aug. 29, 1989
Boone et al. (Boone) 5,101,270 Mar. 31, 1992
Martin D. Levine, VISION IN MAN AND MACHINE, 518-19 (1985).
Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Crane and Boone. Claim 14 stands
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Crane,
Boone and Levine. Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Crane, Boone and Peppers.
Claims 3, 7 through 10, 16 through 22 and 24 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Boone and
Peppers. Claims 5, 13 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Boone, Peppers and Levine.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or
the Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer
for the details thereof.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007