Appeal No. 95-1844
Application 07/822,063
Markuson et al. (Markuson) 4,767,280 Aug. 30, 1988
Claims 1-27 stand rejected on prior art as follows:
1. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Lehrmann.
2. Claims 1, 6 and 18-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson.
3. Claims 2, 3 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson and
further in view of Lehrmann.
4. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson and further in
view of Leyde.
5. Claims 8-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson and Lehrmann
and further in view of Deffenbaugh.
6. Claims 14-17 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson and
Lehrmann and further in view of Leyde and Garmong.
7. Claim 24 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson and Lehrmann.
8. Claim 25 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson and Leyde.
9. Claims 26 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Béjot in view of Markuson,
Lehrmann, Leyde and Garmong.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007