Appeal No. 95-1844
Application 07/822,063
In summary, the prior art rejections of the claims
have been sustained with respect to claims 1-3, 5-7, 10-24, 26
and 27, but have been reversed with respect to claims 4, 8, 9
and 25. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1-27 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
RICHARD TORCZON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
19
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007