THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PAPU D. MANIAR
__________
Appeal No. 95-2063
Application 07/965,3141
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH, and ELLIS Administrative Patent
Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 12, 13, 16, and 20 through 22, which are all the claims
pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed Oct. 23, 1992. According to
the appellant, the application is a division of Application
07/650,119, filed Feb. 4, 1991, now Patent No. 5,186,745.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007