Ex parte MANIAR - Page 1




                                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                      
                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                                         
                    was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                                                        
                    binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                              Paper No. 18                                                 

                                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                      
                                                                           __________                                                                                      
                                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                      
                                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                      
                                                                           __________                                                                                      
                                                              Ex parte PAPU D. MANIAR                                                                                      
                                                                           __________                                                                                      
                                                                   Appeal No. 95-2063                                                                                      
                                                              Application 07/965,3141                                                                                      
                                                                           __________                                                                                      
                                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                                      
                                                                           __________                                                                                      

                    Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH, and ELLIS Administrative Patent                                                                                            
                    Judges.                                                                                                                                                
                    ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                    

                                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                      
                              This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                                                                     
                    claims 12, 13, 16, and 20 through 22, which are all the claims                                                                                         
                    pending in the application.                                                                                                                            




                              1Application for patent filed Oct. 23, 1992.  According to                                                                                   
                    the appellant, the application is a division of Application                                                                                            
                    07/650,119, filed Feb. 4, 1991, now Patent No. 5,186,745.                                                                                              
                                                                                    1                                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007