THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARC STAMMER
____________
Appeal No. 95-2175
Application 08/100,3321
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, PATE and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
5. Claim 6 has been allowed. In the advisory action (Paper No.
16) dated May 17, 1994, the examiner indicated that claims 7-11
Application for patent filed July 30, 1993. According to1
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/921,673, filed July 30, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007