Appeal No. 95-2219
Application 08/041,922
1087, 37 USPQ2d at 1239, citing W. L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v.
Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d at 1551, 1553, 220 USPQ at 311, 312-13.
Upon reviewing Brown, we fail to find any suggested desirability
of modifying Brown to obtain a logic for decoding instructions as
recited in Appellants’ claims 1 through 14 or a means for
decoding the instructions as recited in Appellants’ claims 15
through 20.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 20
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is
reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS
) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007