Appeal No. 95-2233 Application 07/978,014 INTRODUCTION Initially, we observe that the prosecution history of this application and the briefings before the Board are not a model of clarity. For this reason, we contemplated remanding to the examiner. On reflection, however, we decided that we can resolve the issues presented on appeal and, in the interest of judicial economy, we shall do so. REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM Claim 2, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows: 2. A free-flowing, non-dusting water dispersible granule of an active agricultural chemical having low friability and effective crush strength for delivery to a desired site as a stable suspension in water, without deleterious foaming, comprising an active agricultural chemical and about 1-6% by weight thereof of a binder which will dissipate its binding action when the granule is immersed in water which is a copolymer of (a) polyvinylpyrrolidone and (b) a comonomer selected from butene and vinyl acetate, and mixtures thereof, and optional agents selected from the group consisting of defoamers, wetting agents and dispersing agents. THE REFERENCES The examiner relies on the following references: 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007