Appeal No. 95-2233
Application 07/978,014
on the grounds of rejection set forth in the Examiner’s Answer,
this case presents two issues on appeal:
(1) Whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 2 through
6, 8 and 9 under 35 USC § 112, second paragraph, as indefinite;
and
(2) Whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 2 through
6, 8 and 9 under 35 USC § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
disclosures of Feyen, Narayanan, and Morner.
DELIBERATIONS
Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation
and review of the following materials:
(1) The instant specification, including Figures 1 and 2 and
all of the claims on appeal;
(2) Applicants’ Brief before the Board;
(3) The Examiner’s Answer;
(4) The above-cited references relied on by the examiner;
and
(5) Paper No. 3 filed November 4, 1993, including copies of
the trade literature attached thereto.
On consideration of the record, including the above-listed
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007