THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT J. MELLO
WILLIAM P. TEW
and NARLIN B. BEATY
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2655
Application 07/912,0291
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SCHAFER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed July 9, 1992. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/798,835, filed November 25, 1991, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/542,389, filed June 23, 1990,
now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/384,530, filed July 24, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007