THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 44 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ROBERT J. MELLO WILLIAM P. TEW and NARLIN B. BEATY _____________ Appeal No. 95-2655 Application 07/912,0291 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before SCHAFER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. 1Application for patent filed July 9, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/798,835, filed November 25, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/542,389, filed June 23, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/384,530, filed July 24, 1989, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007