Appeal No. 95-2665
Application 07/999,609
references relied on and does not appear to cure the noted
deficiencies in the examiner’s positions.3
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 5-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JAMES D. THOMAS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
RICHARD TORCZON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
From our study of the claims, we note the following in passing. The3
“first portion” in claim 7, line 3, should probably be --second portion-- to
agree with claim 18, Figure 4b and specification pages 10 and 11.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007