THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOHN P. CRONIN, ANOOP AGRAWAL
and MICHAEL TROSKY
________________
Appeal No. 95-2718
Application 07/914,8521
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
31. Claims 32 and 33, the other claims remaining in the
present application, stand withdrawn from consideration.
Claim 1 is
illustrative:
1Application for patent filed July 15, 1992.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007