THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte NIRAJ KUMAR ____________ Appeal No. 95-3265 Application 08/047,1621 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Application for patent filed April 14, 1993. According to1 appellant, the application is a continuation of Application 07/431,924, filed November 6, 1989, now abandoned. -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007