THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MASAYUKI TATEWAKI, HIROMASA
KATO and KENICHI OBINATA
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3481
Application 08/017,9771
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 4, 7 and 8, which are the only claims
remaining in this application.
1 Application for patent filed February 12, 1993. According to applicants,
this application is a continuation of Application 07/834,612, filed February 12,
1992, which is a division of Application 07/667,829, filed March 12, 1991, now
Patent No. 5,186,994, granted February 16, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007