Appeal No. 95-3611 Application 07/904,419 wafer to the combined vapor. This appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by independent claim 1 which reads as follows: 1. A method for vapor phase wafer cleaning, comprising the steps of: combining hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride and water vapor; and exposing the wafer to said combined vapor. The references relied upon by the examiner in the rejections before us are: Tanaka 5,078,832 Jan. 7, 1992 Deal, ?Vapor-Phase Wafer Cleaning, Oxide Etching, and Thin Film Growth?, Paper presented at First International Symposium on Cleaning Technology in Semiconductor Device Manufacturing at the Fall Meeting of The Electrochemical Society in Hollywood, Florida, pages 1-8, October 15-20, 1989. Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 USC § 102(b) as being anticipated by Deal. Claims 2 through 15 stand rejected under 35 USC § 103 as being unpatentable over Deal in view of Tanaka. We will not sustain either of these rejections. Both of the rejections before us are pivotally founded upon 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007