THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 59
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OLE K. NILSSEN
____________
Appeal No. 95-3616
Application 07/839,065
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the
arguments of Appellant and the examiner. Our decision presumes
familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the
evidence of record supports each of the following fact findings.
A. The nature of the case
1. This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 62, 63, and 66-73. (Paper 51 at 1.) The
examiner also rejected claim 64 in the answer. (Paper 54 at 1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007