THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte NOBUAKI MATSUDA and KESANAO KOBAYASHI
________________
Appeal No. 95-3623
Application 07/714,4071
________________
HEARD: October 15, 1997
________________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1, 5, 9, 10, 12 and 13 as amended after final rejection.
Claim 14, which is the only other claim remaining in the
application, has been withdrawn from consideration by the
examiner as being directed toward a nonelected invention.
1Application for patent filed May 29, 1991.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007