Ex parte NOBUAKI MATSUDA et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                          Paper No. 34                                                                        

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                Ex parte NOBUAKI MATSUDA and KESANAO KOBAYASHI                                                                
                                                        Appeal No. 95-3623                                                                    
                                                   Application 07/714,4071                                                                    
                                                   HEARD: October 15, 1997                                                                    
                Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                           

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow                                                               
                claims 1, 5, 9, 10, 12 and 13 as amended after final rejection.                                                               
                Claim 14, which is the only other claim remaining in the                                                                      
                application, has been withdrawn from consideration by the                                                                     
                examiner as being directed toward a nonelected invention.                                                                     

                         1Application for patent filed May 29, 1991.                                                                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007