THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte SHADI L. MALHOTRA, BRENT S. BRYANT
and DORIS K. WEISS
________________
Appeal No. 95-3783
Application 08/034,9171
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3,
5-14, 16-22, 25 and 26, all the claims remaining in the present
application. A copy of illustrative claim 1 is appended to this
decision.
In addition to the admitted state of the prior art, the
examiner relies upon the following reference in the rejection of
the appealed claims:
1Application for patent filed March 19, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007