Appeal No. 95-3783
Application 08/034,917
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner’s
rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and 35 U.S.C. § 103 are
sustained, whereas the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, is reversed. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 1-3, 5-10 and 25 is affirmed, and the examiner’s
rejection of claims 11-14, 16-22 and 26 is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JOHN D. SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
THOMAS A. WALTZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007