THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BERNARD BENE ____________ Appeal No. 95-3830 Application 07/942,4601 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 12, 15-17, 20-22, 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over prior art. Claims 1-11 have been canceled. Dependent claims 13, 14, 18, 19, 23 and 24 have been indicated as being allowable if presented in proper form. References Relied on by the Examiner Application for patent filed September 9, 1992.1 -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007