THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte PAULS DAVIS, STEVEN D. GAGNON
and ERIC LIND
________________
Appeal No. 95-3858
Application 07/931,6281
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3-7,
9-13, 26, 28, 34 and 36. Claims 17, 18, 21, 24, 32, 38 and 39,
the other claims remaining in the present application, stand
withdrawn from consideration. A copy of illustrative claim 1 is
appended to this decision.
1Application for patent filed August 18, 1992. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/455,540, filed December 22, 1989, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007