Appeal No. 95-4325 Application 08/006,957 10. Therefore, we do not find that these teachings of Tanaka anticipated Appellant’s claims 6 and 7. In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 3, 5 through 14 and 16 through 19 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 15Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007