Appeal No. 95-4722 Application 07/946,226 has failed to establish a prima facie case of the obviousness of claims 18-20. Accordingly, we do not sustain the rejection of claims 18-20. In summary, we have not sustained either of the examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-24 is reversed. REVERSED ) JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Thomas H. Close EASTMAN KODAK CO. 343 State Street Patent Department 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007