Appeal No. 95-4932
Application No. 07/990,216
The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:
Völker et al. (Völker) 4,118,199 Oct. 03,
1978
Subramanian et al. (Subramanian) 5,179,053 Jan. 12,
1993
The following rejections are before us for consideration:
I. Claims 1 and 3-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
112,
first paragraph, for lack of enablement.
II. Claim 1 alone stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(e) as being anticipated by Subramanian.
III. Claims 1 and 3-12 stand rejected for obviousness
under
35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of Völker.
We shall not sustain any of the aforementioned rejections
for the reasons set forth by appellants in their brief and
reply brief. Accordingly, we reverse each of the rejections
applied by the examiner. We add the following comments for
emphasis:
I. The 35 U.S.C. § 112 Rejection
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007