THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GARY D. POWER
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0107
Application 08/026,7971
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, HANLON and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-20, all of the claims pending in the
application. Claims 1, 5 and 12 are illustrative of the subject
matter on appeal and read as follows:
1. In a microchannel plate, the improvement
comprising:
1Application for patent filed March 5, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007