Ex parte POWER - Page 3




                Appeal No. 96-0107                                                                                                            
                Application 08/026,797                                                                                                        


                         The following rejections are at issue in this appeal:2                                                               
                         (1) Claims 1-9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                          
                being unpatentable over Aebi et al.                                                                                           
                         (2) Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                              
                unpatentable over Aebi et al. in view of Warde et al.                                                                         
                         (3) Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                                           
                paragraph, as being indefinite.                                                                                               

                                                     The claimed invention                                                                    

                         The claimed invention is directed to a microchannel plate                                                            
                comprising a layer of dielectric material on or adjacent to the                                                               
                ground plane of the microchannel plate.  The layer of dielectric                                                              
                material is provided with openings which "align with, without                                                                 
                covering holes in the microchannel plate" (claim 1).  See also                                                                
                claim 5 (a layer of electrically insulating material has openings                                                             
                which "align with but do not cover holes in said microchannel                                                                 
                plate"); claim 12 (openings are formed in a layer of dielectric                                                               
                material which "align with but do not cover holes in the                                                                      
                microchannel plate").  According to appellant, this layer of                                                                  
                dielectric material on or adjacent to the ground plane of the                                                                 

                         2   Claims 12-20 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in the final Office                                             
                action dated October 28, 1994.  This rejection has been withdrawn by the examiner                                             
                (Answer, p.2).                                                                                                                
                                                                      3                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007