THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JEFFREY R. STONEHAM AND DAVID C. SMART
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0362
Application 07/909,3501
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, MARTIN, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-12,
which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.
We reverse.
1Application for patent filed July 6, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007